In October 2013, Blackstone introduced a new kind of bond that’s a rental-market twist on the mortgage-backed securities that made so much money for Wall Street before blowing up. Instead of pooling mortgage payments and selling slices of that revenue stream to investors, Blackstone is pooling the monthly rental checks from tenants in 3,207 of its houses and paying bondholders a portion of that stream — after taking out expenses. Moody’s rated the biggest portion of the bond AAA, and demand was so great that Blackstone was able to borrow $479 million at a combined interest rate of about 1.9 percent, less than half of the typical 30-year mortgage rate. The money covered most of what the company had spent buying and fixing up the houses, which have already risen 18 percent in value. The deal was so attractive that two other major new players in the single-family rental field, Colony Capital and American Homes 4 Rent, soon announced similar bonds. In March, Blackstone and some of the other biggest purchasers said they had slowed their acquisition of new properties. Farther afield, Blackstone has raised more than $2 billion for buying properties in Asia and Europe, where real estate markets in many ailing countries are still far from recovery.
Blackstone built its rental-home business with an advantage few if any other buyers could match: a $3.6 billion credit line. Its Invitation Homes subsidiary quickly became the largest single-family home landlord in the U.S., with 41,000 properties. Altogether, hedge funds, private-equity firms and real estate investment trusts have raised about $20 billion to purchase as many as 200,000 homes to rent. The buying — often by employees who brought stacks of certified checks to foreclosure auctions on courthouse steps — helped turned down-and-out markets such as Arizona, California, Florida and Georgia into booming ones as the firms outbid local investors and drained markets of foreclosures. As bargains disappeared from one place, they rapidly moved on to the next. The impact of their purchases was magnified by the fact that the firms often target the same sorts of properties in the same neighborhoods.
The firms clearly played a role in lifting property values, and in many cases they are removing blight by fixing damaged, vacant houses and filling them with tenants. But individuals and smaller investors complain that these outsiders paying cash have sucked up the best bargains. And while the firms have hired thousands of workers to maintain the properties, they face a bigger logistical challenge than the owner of an apartment complex, and some tenants report poor service. Housing advocates have called for federal intervention: They complain that lower-income home buyers are being shut out of the market, worry that the need for big profits will push up rents and are skeptical that the return of the real estate money machine will end well. “The last time Wall Street devised a plan to make mountains of money off our homes it ended catastrophically,” the Atlanta branch of the American Friends Service Committee said on its blog after a protest at a foreclosure auction that was dominated by private-equity bidders. Economists at the Federal Reserve have noted the same potential for danger.
The Reference Shelf
- “The Big Rent,” a series of Bloomberg News articles
- Bloomberg Visual Data charts examine private equity’s impact on the Greater Phoenix rental market and Blackstone’s funding strategy.
- A Federal Reserve paper in December examined the rise of business investors in the rental-home market.
- A Fannie Mae report examining the rapid growth of single-family rentals.
- A Census Bureau survey found rental vacancies down and rents up between 2009 and 2011.
- The Center for Housing Policy’s review of research into the rental market.