In January, the Treasury Department announced that as many as 6 million taxpayers could face fines under the individual mandate. For 2014, a larger group — as many as 20 percent of taxpayers — will be allowed to claim a long list of exemptions from the requirement to carry insurance. They include excuses such as a death in the family, domestic violence or if a person’s 2013 coverage was canceled. The penalty comes in the form of a fine added to your taxes (due in April 2015) of $95 per person or as much as 1 percent of household taxable income, whichever is higher, up to as $12,240 for a wealthy family. By 2016, those figures will rise to $695 and 2.5 percent, and will be indexed to inflation thereafter. Besides those paying the mandate, many more people will need to do new calculations for their taxes related to any subsidies they received for their insurance in 2014. Depending on how their income differed from an earlier estimate, they might owe the government money or get a refund.
Liberals like to point out that the individual mandate was originally a conservative notion, proposed in 1989 by the Heritage Foundation, and that it was a key part of the health-care reform adopted in Massachusetts in 2006 under Republican Gov Mitt Romney. The idea was that without such a prod, any promise to guarantee coverage to those with pre-existing conditions would collapse in a “death spiral” as older, sicker enrollees push up premiums, leading ever more “young invincibles” to decide they can skip insurance, leading rates to rise even further. As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama opposed the individual mandate, then changed his mind as he prepared legislation in 2009. After the health-reform law was signed in 2010, the mandate became the focus of legal challenges, with conservatives calling a government rule that required purchase of a private product an unprecedented intrusion. In 2012, four Supreme Court justices said that the mandate was justified under Congress’s power to regulate commerce and four called it unconstitutional. The deciding vote was cast by Chief Justice John Roberts, who upheld it not under the commerce clause but as part of Congress’s power to tax.
Republicans have not dropped their objections to either Obamacare or the individual mandate, which they describe as unwarranted government coercion. But after taking control of both houses of Congress in the 2014 midterm elections their leaders decided to take a piecemeal approach to reshaping the health care law and focused on other provisions. At the same time, they have also criticized Obama for expanding exemptions to the mandate, with some calling it a stealth repeal of the unpopular provision and others questioning whether the Internal Revenue Service will actually enforce it. The White House says the mandate will be enforced. But even its allies say it has been looking for ways to do so lightly, at least until the law has taken hold. Insurers continue to insist that the mandate is crucial to balancing out the added costs Obamacare places on them.
The Reference Shelf
- Congressional Research Service report on the individual mandate.
- U.S. Internal Revenue Service question and answer page on the mandate.
- A chart from an insurance industry trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, on different estimates of the impact of dropping the mandate.
- Annotated excerpts from the opinions in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act.
- A compilation of pre-Obamacare calls for an individual mandate.