The share of Americans with a job or trying to find one fell steeply when the recession began and has stayed unusually low. It’s been hovering around 63 percent, down from 66.4 in 2007 and in June it matched its lowest point in 36 years at 62.8 percent. But the reasons it’s low have shifted, researchers say. Soon after the downturn hit, large numbers of people felt so glum about their employment prospects that they stopped looking — becoming what economists tellingly call “discouraged workers.” Usually, that group gets back in the game pretty quickly when the job market recovers. That hasn’t happened. Maybe that’s because the recession was unusually long, the recovery unusually slow and job searches unusually daunting. The same thing is happening in Europe — in the countries using the euro there were 9.3 million people available to work but not seeking employment in 2013. There are also other factors at work, notably the aging of the baby boom generation. One U.S. Federal Reserve paper credited retirements by older workers for as much as 80 percent of the decrease in labor force participation over the past two years.
Beginning in about 1965, labor-force participation started swelling as baby boomers started jobs, and then rose further as an increasing number of women untied their aprons and entered the workplace. The labor force participation rate peaked at 67.3 in January 2000, right as the oldest baby boomers reached their last year in the prime working ages of 25 to 54. Now, retirements are running at a far faster pace. Surveys show that more older Americans are willing to work past 65 than a decade or two ago, but that group is still a minority. And the size of the baby boom cohort means that the number who do retire will continue to drag down the share of Americans at work. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that by 2022 the labor-force participation rate will be down to 61.6 percent.
It’s no surprise that the generation of younger workers succeeding retiring baby boomers is smaller. The question being debated is whether the new reality of a smaller workforce should change the way economists judge how strong the economy is. If shrinking workforce participation means the economy has less potential for growth than in the past — in effect, a lower speed limit — that’s an argument for policies like the Fed’s bond-buying to stimulate job creation. If not, pumping in more money could cause inflation. Either way, while the unemployment and job figures get more headlines when they’re released every month, the labor force participation rate remains a more important focus for economists looking for clues on the future pace of growth in the world’s largest economy.
The Reference Shelf
- Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the labor force participation rate.
- How the U.S.’s labor force participation rate compares with that of other countries.
- Research from President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers outlining causes for the decline in labor force participation and policy implications.
- Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia breaking down the reasons for nonparticipation.
- A brief from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College on the impact of aging baby boomers on labor-force participation.