Since rising to power in early 2013, China’s leaders have pushed ahead with dozens of reforms. The changes range from letting families have a second child to expanding farmers’ land rights, cracking down on bribe-taking and reducing state controls over interest rates. Altogether they constitute the biggest policy shifts since at least the 1990s. How fast the changes will come is another question. Delegates to China’s legislature, the National People’s Congress, gathered in March 2015 to discuss the slowing economy, as well as new measures to grapple with pollution and overhaul state-owned enterprises. China’s reform goals were left vague in 2013, allowing plenty of leeway for delays and results that fall short of expectations. The main specific was setting a plan to finish by 2020. Two overarching objectives have remained clear: ensuring the party’s right to govern, and transitioning from an economy reliant on exports and infrastructure investment to one fueled by domestic consumption and the guiding hand of the market. Done right, China’s leaders may be putting the economy on the path to surpassing the U.S. as the world’s largest and making its citizens wealthier. On the other hand, the consequences for the world could be dire if China doesn’t manage to eliminate overcapacity, revive the property market and focus more on the quality of economic growth than on hitting prescribed annual targets.
China completed its once-a-decade transfer of power to a new generation of leaders at the 2013 National People’s Congress after what many saw as a decade of inaction under President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao. Expectations were high that President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang would follow through with reforms. Since then, however, the country has seen little concrete progress toward promises to control local-government debt, strengthen environmental protection and reform state-owned enterprises — though a default in April 2015 by a state-owned company signaled the government’s willingness to let market forces take their course. One reason may be that China’s growth was 7.4 percent in 2014, the lowest since 1990, and slowed to 7 percent in the first quarter of 2015.
There are many factions inside China’s one-party state, including vested interests with a stake in preserving the system. Some want reforms like exchange-rate and interest-rate liberalization and a breakup of state monopolies. Others prefer more state control. Big state-owned companies and the families of communist leaders want to maintain benefits they have built up over the years. (One example: China could benefit from a property tax but many officials demur; they don’t want to list their real-estate assets.) Local governments don’t obey the center because they have their own incentives to do what they think is best for their careers and their localities. There’s danger for the party in doing too much or too little, in alienating domestic allies on the one hand or provoking capital flight if the economy founders on the other. The added complication now is that the Internet, while controlled, has given voice to hundreds of millions of people, many of whom are clamoring for relief from pollution, corruption, injustice and inequality.
The Reference Shelf
- The World Bank and Development Research Center’s 2012 report China 2030.
- Bloomberg News article on Xi Jinping’s ascent to the head of the Communist Party in November 2012.
- The Hoover Institution’s China Leadership Monitor.
- Official government website for the Communist Party in English.
- Bloomberg News QuickTakes on China’s air pollution and interest rates.
- International Monetary Fund China page and report on its 2013 consultation with China.
- McKinsey reports: What’s Next for China.
- The Sinocism China Newsletter by Bill Bishop, an American living in Beijing who cofounded CBS MarketWatch in 1997.